First, you can make something clear. The interface is not something that is something. The papers are not ergonomic and non-ergonomic, ergonomics ergonomics are good or bad. Therefore, if the advertising says, the new panacea, it is ergonomically correct. Not only should the interface is good or bad.
Therefore, good ergonomics worth the time and / or costs associated with them and development? Of course! Good ergonomics is the gift that keeps. But I have an ergonomic design, perhaps, so I'm biased.
In fact, I'm biased. I'm not sure ergonomics choose to availability for work or school. From childhood I have seen the benefits are not just doing things right, but to make things from scratch trying to do. Much later, I discovered that others will follow and has a cool name to go with it.
I believe that good ergonomics is worth developing, because to do so. I do not think so because my heart tells me it's true, but because of the cold tests, scientific. Thousands of studies show that the value of developing good ergonomics more than offset the costs.
employee productivity has increased over the past century due primarily to higher education and ergonomics. our market share of new products are especially for the experience with ergonomics. poverty reduction as a task mainly due to the ease of use (a subset of, you guessed it, ergonomics). Attractive than the bad ergonomics.
No comments:
Post a Comment